Counter-Argument Essay

The recent improver of violence at give lessonss has proved the inconsistence of previous preventive measures. There is a persistent need to find a new solution for the live problem of school shooting. The number of school shooting victims increases with severally day, this is wherefore the newly designed preventive measures should be fast, effective, and should not ca drug abuse e really side effects to those who study and work at schools. In this status alloylic elementlic element detectors at schools remain the only promising perspective which result minimize the relative incidence of violence against teenagers and their teachers. alloy detectors should be installed at schools because they would detect weapons that could be used to commit violent crimes, even though umpteen good deal think that this would not stop crimes. Metal detectors at schools There is no official statistics as for the number of victims and incidents of school violence through the stopover betwee n 2005 and 2008. However, it is not difficult to create the timeline of the major school shootings in the U. S. for the last three years.March 21, 2005 (Red Lake, Minnesota) Jeff Weise, 16, killed grandfather and companion, then arrived at school where he killed a teacher, a auspices rubber, 5 students, and finally himself. November 58, 2005 (Jacksboro, Tennessee) ane 15-year-old shot and killed an assistant principal at Campbell County senior high School and ill wounded two other administrators. September 26, 2006 (Bailey, Colorado) adult male held sixer students hostage at Platte Canyon High School and then shot and killed Emily Keyes, 16, and himself (Infoplease).This list keister be further expanded, and there is no transparent tendency towards the decrease of school crimes. The problem is aggravated by the particular that only few schools use metal detectors as a security measure in 2005, nearly all (99 percent) students ages 12-18 observed the use of at least maven of the selected security measures at their school. Metal detectors were the least observed of the selected safety and security measures 11 percent of students reported the use of metal detectors in their school. (Indicator 21)Of course, it is difficult to argue that metal detectors are expensive, save is it estimable to speak about financial costs when it comes to protecting lives and health of children? For example, the Cleveland metropolis Council had to invest $2. 5 million of state money into equipping its schools with metal detector (Wagner). For many people this sum sounds as viable apology of why metal detectors should not be installed at schools. Simultaneously, this sum becomes hollow against the value of students and teachers safety.Moreover, metal detectors are presented in several different forms, and each school may choose the product to suit its needs and budget. When parents facial expression that their children are not safe, they start looking for other alter natives which would secure their children from cosmos involved into tragic accidents at school. This is why metal detectors should be installed at schools to detect the weapons, and ultimately, to keep children from leaving to another school. Despite the high cost of metal detectors, they thrust already proved to be an efficient putz in decreasing violence and preventing shooting and other related accidents at schools.Five public schools of New York were participating in the experiment, which was aimed at determining the effectualness of metal detectors. In a report to the Board of Education, the Chancellor utter that 820 weapons had been found on students or near the search areas at fin schools. Only five weapons were firearms (Gootman A3). It is possible to state that the experiment was successful metal detectors not only helped find weapons, but discouraged pupils and students from bringing weapons to school.The word of metal detectors benefits will be incomplete if we do not try out the successes of certain schools which already use metal detectors. The example of John F. Kennedy High School in Bronx is very illustrative due to the fact that it was traditionally one of the most problematic educational entities in Bronx area. After one of the students was stabbed to death by a school companion, the principal directed meaningful resources at reviving school safety. The metal detector has helped detect legion(predicate) box-cutters before they were carried inside the school building the fights in the hallway bemuse remained in the past.This is what the students and teachers said about the new metal detecting guard In terms of security, its been a blessing. I touch sensation a lot safer. I was very afraid (Gootman, A3). To be honest, it is not very clear why so many people vote against the use of metal detectors at schools. It seems that the high price of these useful devices is the only justification for those who refuse to recognize the benefit s of metal detectors. For some reason, parents think that THIS will never happen to THEIR children.Simultaneously, metal detectors are extremely effective in preventing the incidence of violence at schools. Childhood is the period of extreme emotions and unreasonable actions. Metal detectors may actually prevent the child from committing a crime which he might be later regretting for the rest of his life. Metal detectors may retain thousands of childrens lives. They are expensive, but these expenses are reasonable when we want to feel safe during our lessons. Conclusion Evidently, there are not so many reasons against installing metal detectors at schools.For those who vote against such measures, the price of metal detectors is the basic argument. However, the life of a child is priceless. Our parents have to understand that they can protect our lives when we are at school, and metal detectors have proved to be a success in this safety campaign. Each school should have a metal dete ctor not only to detect weapons, but to discourage students from bringing weapons to school. Works Cited Gootman, E. Metal Detectors and Pep Rallies Revival of a Bronx High School. The New York Times, February 4, 2004, p. A3. Indicator 21.Students Reports of Safety and Security Measures Observed at School. 2007. National Center for Educational Statistics. 22 February 2008. http//nces. ed. gov/programs/crimeindicators/crimeindicators2007/ind_21. asp Infoplease. A Timeline of juvenile Worldwide School Shootings. 2008. Infoplease. com. 22 February 2008. http//www. infoplease. com/ipa/A0777958. html Wagner, J. L. Metal Detectors Approved for Cleveland Schools, impart Cost $3. 3 million. 2007. Cleveland. com. 22 February 2008. http//blog. cleveland. com/metro/2007/10/metal_detectors_approved_for_c. html